top of page

Should Leaders Have a License to Practice?

In most professions, a license signifies a standard of competence and assurance that the holder has met specific qualifications and adheres to recognized practices. We see this in medicine, law, and even among commercial pilots. It's a promise of safety, reliability, and professional integrity. But what about leadership? Should those who guide our organizations and influence our work lives also require a license to practice?

Interestingly, leadership is often seen as a quality that either you have, or you don’t—something innate that can't necessarily be taught. This myth persists despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that effective leadership skills can indeed be developed through formal training. Yet, the reality remains that many individuals find themselves in leadership positions not because they are necessarily ready or capable, but because they were next in line, or had outstanding technical skills. Few have received formal leadership training, which begs the question: Are we doing enough to prepare our leaders?

The consequences of untrained leaders can be significant, both positively and negatively. Effective leaders inspire their teams, drive engagement, and encourage loyalty and productivity. They create environments where ideas flourish, people feel valued, and teams achieve their potential. Conversely, ineffective leaders can breed discontent, stifle growth, and cause high turnover—each of which comes at a high cost to any organization. The impact extends beyond the collective; it touches individuals on a deeply personal level, affecting their career progression, job satisfaction, and even mental health.

Given these high stakes, it’s worth considering the potential benefits of a formal licensing process for leaders. This could involve structured training programs that emphasize not only strategic and operational management skills but also interpersonal dynamics and ethical decision-making. Such a program could help ensure that leaders are not only proficient in managing projects and processes but are also adept at handling the nuanced human aspects of leadership.

Imagine a world where leaders are as well-trained as doctors or lawyers, where standardized exams and continuous professional development are the norms in the trajectory of a leadership career. This could help mitigate the risks associated with unqualified leaders stepping into roles of great influence and responsibility.

Of course, the idea of licensing leaders raises numerous questions. What would the criteria be? Who would administer this certification? And perhaps most critically, how would we quantify the "soft skills" that are so crucial to effective leadership, such as empathy, adaptability, and emotional intelligence?

Implementing a licensing system for leaders could potentially elevate the profession by setting a high standard for what is expected and by providing a pathway for acquiring the necessary skills. Moreover, it could help to ensure that those entering leadership roles are doing so for the right reasons—not just for a higher salary or a prestigious title, but to genuinely make a positive impact on their teams and organizations.

Before we continue debating, here’s a thought for you to ponder: If leaders had to earn a license to lead, how might this change the way we view authority and governance in our places of work? Would this foster a new era of accountability and growth in corporate cultures worldwide?

By raising these questions, we invite a broader discussion on how to best prepare and empower those who lead us. Because in the end, the quality of our leaders is foundational to the success of our organizations, and indeed, to the well-being of each team member they guide.


bottom of page